March 20, 2026
Biden's War on Mothers
Timothy Birdnow
Biden used the CIA to wage war on mothers and motherhood as "white supremacist" and potentially terrorist.
Thank God those demons are gone from power - at least for now.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:41 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 37 words, total size 1 kb.
Dope Leo - Stuck on Stupid
Timothy Birdnow
More proof that the Americansky Pope is a socialist.
This Pope said "health" is a human right, not healthcare. That means that society is absolutely bound to make people healthy whether they like it or not. That means they can tell you what to eat, what to drink, how to live, how to sleep and you have to obey because "health is a right".
He used the phrase "health equity" which is Marxist to the very core.
Odd; I've read the Bible cover-to-cover and never once saw anything saying health is a basic right. And in fact poor health was one of the curses God specifically smote Adam and Eve with, meaning it is from HIM and not from anything we do. We are supposed to try to help the sick, comfort them, but we are not obligated to provide good health to others; that is the province of God Almighty.
And of course we cannot guarantee good health.
The man is clueless as to what constitutes a right. Rights place no burden on third parties; they are something you inherently possess and would have as long as nobody actively takes it away from you. All of the so-called rights that leftists like Dope Leo advocate require society to take positive, aggressive action for you to be able to access. People who do not know you are forced to aid you at their expense. Those are not rights - they are privileges.
We live in a world governed by the absolute necessity of seeking wealth. It is the core of our existence and it comes from the curse placed on Adam when God told him he had to work if he wanted to eat. While it is possible to be charitable it is quite difficult because wealth is a hard thing to amass and a harder thing to keep and everybody has to find a way to acquire it. In Heaven there would be no need of that but on this Earth it is the most basic necessity. That is why healthcare has always been a for-profit enterprise; people need to get paid to do it. Yes, there are not-for-profit medical services and usually they are pretty poor precisely because there is no money in it and those doing it wind up moving to a for-profit medical service. You ultimately get what you pay for.
Leo wants to simply deny all that and demand free health care for everyone with just a waive of the magic wand. But it doesn't work that way and if he truly cared for the poor he would support paid medical services, since they often also serve those who can't pay. Drive them out and who will take care of the poor then? The one or two hospitals that cater to such? Good luck with that; they'll be broke in no time.
Paul John Paul II and his successor Benedict were both Conservatives but they did what Conservatives do and did not purge the Left from the Vatican. Once Francis got in he immediately moved to cement the Left's power over the Catholic Church in permanently and Leo was the end result.
I see no way of fixing this because Leo now appoints the cardinals, just as Francis had done, and they are now all leftists. The Church is permanently stuck on stupid and will remain so.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
09:09 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 582 words, total size 4 kb.
Ratcliffe Tells Congress Iran had Enriched Uranium
Timothy Birdnow
CIA Director John Ratcliffe confirms Iran has been enriching nuclear material well beyond the level required for nuclear reactors. In other words they were making weapons grade material.
It's hard to hide enriched nuclear material; it tend to be visible on detectors, even when underground (to a degree).
I have no doubt they were trying to build nuclear weapons, and if they had those weapons they probably would have used at least a few of them.
They still might, you never know.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:49 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 100 words, total size 1 kb.
Margaret Brennan Sneers at Christianity
Timothy Birdnow
And what is wrong with that Ms. Brennan?
Margaret Brennan
@margbrennan
The Secretary of Defense tells the American public to pray for our troops on bended knee and invoke Jesus' name....
7:15 AM · Mar 19, 2026
·
1.3M
Views
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:31 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 47 words, total size 1 kb.
Diversity is Our Weakness
Timothy Birdnow
A very good question indeed.
Diversity didn't do the Balkans any good, did it? It didn't help the Caucasus, or India. In fact nations with diverse populations are usually poorer, less safe, less free, and weaker than the homogenous societies.
Back in the eighties and nineties, when this diversity stuff started, Japan was rising fast and hard and it was admitted that Japan was doing so well because it was NOT a diverse country. Ditto Germany, which was also riding high at that time.
And the dirty little secret is that China is not in the least diverse and it is the top dog now next to the U.S. and may well displace us. Why? Probably because we are diverse and they are not. (Japan's fall was entirely because they adopted Western Keynsian economic theory and it cost them dearly.)
What are the wealthiest countries on Earth? According to Forbes they are:
1.The United States.
2. China
3. Japan
4. The United Kingdom
5. Germany
6. India
7. France
8. Canada
9. South Korea
10. Italy
Off these only the U.S., India, and perhaps Canada can be said to be truly multicultural, the rest are in varying shades of non-diversity. Certainly the top five are not at all diverse except the U.S. and Britain, and Britain wasn't until the last decade or two. It was fairly homogenous before that, although it had several different countries amalgamated into the United Kingdom.
So you certainly can't make the argument of economic success from diversity. At best you could argue it doesn't HURT economic success, but that is the best case scenario.
Another point abut diversity; it's a one way street. Diversity to the Liberal is getting more minorities to participate, to bring in more Third World peoples, and to marginalize the white majority, particularly the white Conservative male majority. If you have a university faculty that includes several lesbians, several blacks, Asians, Hispanics, and maybe Native Americans but not one single white male you have a "diverse" faculty to them. "Diversity" is but a weapon with which to beat the majority in America.
So in the sacred name of diversity we have open, flagrant discrimination against the people who actually built this country and who form her backbone.
Take a look at the U.S. Post Office; as of 2022 it's workforce was officially 29% black. Now the black population in America is only 14.4% of the population of the United States as of 2024, according to the Pew Research Center.
19% are Hispanic and Asians 6%. Hispanics are at least appropriately represented; they are 20% of the population. Asians are also represented properly as they make up 6.9% of the American population. So if anything Hispanic and Asians are slightly underrepresented.
The point is this isn't "diversity". I would add that postal jobs are given out based on a civil service exam and yet blacks - who routinely score well below Whites and Asians, certainly, on most tests, are way over-represented. So we don't have true diversity at all, but rather special privileges for a favored group.
The author of the article makes the following observation about the need for genetic diversity:
"Yet the amount of genetic diversity needed to produce healthy kids is pretty tiny. Just anyone outside the immediate family will do. Same culture? "
He's right and we have multiple isolated case studies to prove it. For instance, the most remote inhabited place on Earth is an island named Tristan Da Cunha in the South Atlantic ocean. It is three thousand miles from Captetown, it's nearest neighbor. It was settled by a British Lieutenant in the Navy, one John Glass, who decided to stay behind when the Royal Navy pulled out (they occupied the island to prevent the French from using it as a staging ground to rescue Napoleon). Glass stayed behind because he had fallen in love with and married a Capetown Colored woman - a mixed race girl. He couldn't bring her back home with him in those days, so he stayed on the island (and she bore him no fewer than 20 children). Shipwrecked sailors wound up stranded on the island too and decided it was a good place to live and eventually there were six men living on the island. A passing ship captain took pity on them and promised to find them wives - he returned later with five more women, all colored prostitutes, who found it preferable to settle down at the end of the world than continue to scratch out a living selling jelly role to sailors. All of the inhabitants to this day on Tristan are descended from these six couples, or almost all anyway. Yet they are generally healthy and well adjusted and intelligent. Inbreeding didn't hurt them much.
The same is true of the islanders on Pitcairn, the descendants of the mutineers of the Bounty.
It does not require a lot of ethnic diversity to make people healthy. Nor to make a culture healthy.
Yes the European nobility had their problems but some of those can be laid to a rather unhealthy lifestyle.
And Muslims today in the Arab world very often marry first cousins because they actually get to look at those gals and don't have to worry about nasty surprised (anyone remember the Three Stooges where they get Muslim gals and Shemp gets the toothless hag?)
At any rate the push for diversity started back in the eighties and I remember it well. I had these professors who pushed it very hard and it never did make a lick of sense to me. Why, for instance, during the Civil War, were local boys kept together? why were there Irish brigades instead of breaking them up?
The fact is it was the white male Christian heterosexual who built America and made her such a success. That is why they want to force us into the shadows.
Diversity is a scam and always has been a scam to push white male and Christian normies into the shadows and empower everyone outside of the mainstream.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
08:25 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 1026 words, total size 7 kb.
CDC Dropping Rabies Vaccines by Air on Rural Lands
Timothy Birdnow
This may be prudent but the problem is they could put ANYTHING into the environment and who could stop them? What if the CDC started putting contraceptives in particulates and dropped them in rural areas? Urban areas?
The fact is they should have told Americans what they were doing.
In Africa the Gates Foundation has been accused of putting contraceptives in vaccines he gives for free to reduce the number of people, so why wouldn't a guy like Gates do that to the American public? Why not drop it into the environment without our knowledge or consent?
Whether Gates did it or not is immaterial; it COULD be done. (It was a number of Catholic nuns who made the claim, not some Q-Anon people in the U.S.)
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
07:19 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 146 words, total size 1 kb.
Second Verse Same as the First: the Corruption of Science is not New
Timothy Birdnow
I posted this (or tried to anyway; I'm not sure it posted) on a Facebook group full of climate alarmists/Gang Green. I'm hoping to get through their solid little noggins that it is entirely possible to subvert a whole field of science. Read my post below:
One of the things I keep hearing here in this group from the alarmists, the Gang Green as I like to call them, is how we who doubt the scientific validity of climate change are somehow paranoids, seeing dark conspiracies where none exist because it's simply not possible to subvert science in that way, that science is too large and too diverse to actually tamper with the physical data and whatnot. Many of you here believe this with all your hearts. But the reality is we've seen this exact thing happen before in science, and it plunged the whole world into darkness and cost millions of lives and it happened just a hundred years ago.
I'm talking about Eugenics.
Eugenics was a pseudo-science born out of an interpretation of Darwin's theory of Natural Selection and championed by Darwin's cousin Sir Francis Galton. It was based in particular on Darwin's work in The Ascent of Man. Eugenics took the world by storm in a campaign that was amazingly familiar to the modern approach to climate science and it produced nothing but rotten fruit wherever it took hold. The United States was particularly fertile ground, and it led to laws being changed to make anyone with anything but a white Anglo Saxon into a "colored" and thus being largely stripped of civil rights. Jim Crow was an outgrowth of eugenics. So too were some monstrous experiments, like the infamous Cold Spring Harbor experiments, the forced sterilization of those deemed "unfit" by the eugenicists, and a host of other nasty stuff. Harvard was particularly keen on Eugenics, for instance, and was at the forefront (along with many other prestigious Ivy League universities) of the eugenics movement. There were other experiments, like the Tuskeegee syphilis experiments on unsuspecting black people.
All of this was not just approved of by the intellectual establishment f the day but was led by them. Most major universities had departments of eugenics. It was said to be "settled science". Anyone who disagreed with it was shouted down and called anti-science (sound familiar?)
The Germans, upset that the U.S. was so far "ahead" of them, doubled down on eugenics and when Adolf Hitler and the National Socialists came to power they argued not from a position of ignorance or bigotry so much as from the position of science, eugenics in particular. They believed it and believed we were in a civilizational crisis.The eugenicists used arguments nearly identical then as today with climate; that the dangers of doing nothing was too high, that we had to act to save the human race from "mongrelization".
Meanwhile in Russia the Soviets were trying to evolve Man to be happy in the chains of servitude and to do that they had their own eugenics program guided by the quack Trofim Lysenko, who thought he could evolve human beings by essentially creating artificial pressures. Those pressures included telling bald-faced lies and demanding everyone believe them or be punished in the gulag.
At any rate eugenics was international in scope and there were endless streams of papers written in it's defense, and all the major universities were on board with it. International conferences were held (btw Winston Churchill was a member of the Eugenics Society in Britain.) It had a very activist program, and anyone who doubted it was targeted to be destroyed professionally.
All of the tactics we've seen from the environmentalists we saw from the eugenicists. Pretense at being scientific. Calling those who disagree anti-science. professional destruction of those who disagree. Saying it was "settled science". Manipulation of data. Control of key departments in academia to promote the theory. etc.
And this diseased pseudo-science plunged the world into World War II as much as did anything else. It gave us the Nazi Holocaust.
So don't tell me it's impossible for there to be a world-wide conspiracy. We KNOW the Soviets helped to create and nurture the Environmentalist movement from declassified documents. We know Putin is pushing it even now. We have the minutes of the Endangered Atmosphere's Conference where they agreed to promote Global Cooling but keep Global Warming as a backup, then when it was obvious it wasn't getting cooler they simply switched gears. Obama's science advisor John Holdren was one o fthe organizers of that meeting, btw. It was intended to find the common thread of humanity - we all share the atmosphere. It then needed to produce an immanent peril that would allow them to promote the end of capitalism and the promotion of international socialism.
We know that this dovetails with the goals of a lot of organizations. Many corporations are on board precisely because it will eliminate competition and promote, nay, force international trade. It's the same reasons many corporations were on board with Fascism and Naziism in it's day, or why they funded eugenics in the first place.
Governments love money and power and all the governments of the world saw a golden opportunity to enrich and empower themselves through this. The Third World wanted their hands in our cookie jars while the First World saw a way to use the "crisis" to increase the size and scope of government, and to find a cause to unite people. Oh, and to gin up guilt among the populace, making them easier to manipulate.
As I say, this is nothing new; we saw all these tactics and these ideas during the early 20th century in the eugenics movement and the rise of Fascism (including under Woodrow Wilson here in the U.S.)
So all you alarmists who think it is impossible for such a movement to happen you might want to think again. It's already happened. And with modern communications and a far more centralized system of government than we used to have (and more centralized educational system) it should surprise nobody that it is being done and better than the eugenicists ever dreamed possible.
If the media alone reported both sides of the science of this the theory would have long ago been rejected as a failure; it's predictions have all bombed. But the media reports endlessly that "science" says it's happening, and to prove it they use computer models and predictions which are not backed up by the real world. The media is overwhelmingly left wing and just a casual glance at their voting habits is proof of that. They are almost all registered Democrats and most admit they go into the profession "to make a difference" and not report the news. Look at the coverage; they never put skeptical scientists on for balance, for instance. And good luck Googling anything involving climate skepticism; you won't find it, except maybe on page ten of a search if you are lucky. The better stuff just disappears completely, gone down the memory hole.
Why do you guys have to do that if the science is on your side?
I would add that Climatology was nothing but a subset of meteorology originally and most meteorologists did not believe in the doomsday view of carbon dioxide-induced climate change. Those numbers are better for your side now because a whole generation has been taught it is settled science, but most meteorologists were extremely skeptical. Climatologists less so because it saw huge amounts of money rolling into their once-sleepy field.
The fact is Climate Change is nothing more than the modern Eugenics and I fear in the end it will bear fruit as rotten as the old racist theory had.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
04:58 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 1306 words, total size 8 kb.
March 19, 2026
And the Dead Shall Rise
Timothy Birdnow
Wow! Just WOW!
This is the beginning of the end for movie actors; AI will be able to do it cheaper and better and there will be no delays.
How long before we have no actors at all?
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:13 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 58 words, total size 1 kb.
Canada Goes Full Sharia in School
Timothy Birdnow
Sharia in Canada.
So it's no chow if the Muslims can't eat. I wonder if they would have no-meat Fridays during Lent for the Catholics? No? Didn't think so.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
11:08 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 45 words, total size 1 kb.
House Threatens Senate over SAVE
Timothy Birdnow
Good for them! A group of conservative House members are threatening to block any Senate measures that pass through the House if the Senate doesn't pass the SAVE America Act.
It's time to take a stand.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:59 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 44 words, total size 1 kb.
Time Mag: Climate Change Makes You Fat, Lazy, and Stupid
Timothy Birdnow
They're right; it's working with them, as this article was the epitome' of laziness...
It certainly has led to lazy and careless scientific research.
Their argument is in a quarter of a century it will be so hot that nobody will go outside or do anything. But isn't that what happens in winter, at least up north? People are less likely to exercise in bitter cold than in the heat.
We can add this one to the Numbers Watch list of terrible things attributed to climate change..
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:55 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 111 words, total size 1 kb.
Mullin Off to a Terrible Start
Timothy Birdnow
Donald Trump's nominee for Secretary of Homeland Security appears to be nothing but a cowardly surrender monkey.
Yes, he has promised to cave on the practice of using administrative warrants to arrest criminal illegal aliens and is promising to spend years waiting for the courts to issue ICE the warrants they need to pick up these criminals.
Mullin said:
"I have made it very clear to the staff,” Mullin said, "that a judicial warrant will be used to go into houses or to place of businesses unless we are pursuing someone who enters into that place. I have not minced words with that and I haven’t changed my opinion on that.”
fin
The use of administrative warrants has always been acceptable until Obama upped the ante and made a judicial warrant a requirement. The judiciary is already backlogged and getting such a warrant is going to be nigh unto impossible, at least in a timely fashion. The Democrats know this which is why they are demanding it. And Mullin plans to neuter the whole deportation program.
Now I hope he doesn't get approved.
Needless to say this won't satisfy the Democrats who say they will continue to block funding. You can't negotiate with them; they have to be deeated.
Mullin apparently didn't understand that. Or he did and knew they would reject the deal still, so figured he could at least score some political points.
But I don't like it. If they succeed at this they will only try it again, and demand more. Thune should just end the filibuster and do so now. But he won't and the Democrats will continue to hold the American People hostage.
If Mullin doesn't understand this then he's not the man for the job.
BTW I still can't find any polls that ask who is to blame for this. That tells me that the public probably blames Democrats; the polling companies won't do those kinds of polls when it's bad news for the Dems because they don't want to pressure them to surrender. If the GOP was being blamed we would have polls out that would be front-page news.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:41 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 374 words, total size 3 kb.
Trump to Europe "Open the Strait Yourselves"
Timothy Birdnow
Europe is far more reliant on traffic through the Strait of Hormuz than are we, yet they have been refusing to help us there. Trump has taken notice:
RedWave Press
@RedWavePress
NEWS: President Trump on Truth Social: "I wonder what would happen if we "finished off” what’s left of the Iranian Terror State, and let the Countries that use it, we don’t, be responsible for the so called "Strait?” That would get some of our non-responsive ‘Allies’ in gear, and fast!!! President DJT”
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:30 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 92 words, total size 1 kb.
Joe Dirt Kent Was Under Investigation for Leaking
Timothy Birdnow
Yep - Joe Kent was in fact under investigation for leaking.
That's why he made the big show of resigning; he's hoping to garner sympathy from Democrats and then claim he's being unjustly attacked by the Administration.
It is a sound enough strategy if you are a lying dirtbag.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:27 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 60 words, total size 1 kb.
Arguing with Idiots; Climate Doomsday Issue
Timothy Birdnow
Been a while since I did an Arguing with Idiots post but I got into it one a climate discussion board on Facebook and thought it worth reproducing here.
Here goes:
Rocky Rex
Total nonsense. In my case, I have a Physics degree (which included some geology as a side requirement), I taught science for years, and I wrote a few Earth Science textbooks for UK schools. I've read a great many climate science papers. So .......
The first scientific paper hinting at what we now call the greenhouse effect was published in 1824. An experiment showing CO2 was a key greenhouse gas was demonstrated at a scientific event by Mrs Eunice Foote in 1856.
Svante Arrhenius published the first calculation of global warming from human emissions of CO2 in 1897. He'd started off investigating how changes in CO2 could be connected to ice ages.
88 years ago an engineer, who had worked on this in his spare time, produced a key paper in climate science:
"The artificial production of carbon dioxide and its influence on temperature" - Callendar, 1938
This was the first confirmation of actual temperature change using a lot of data from a sizable number of recording stations.
Climate research comes from geology, geophysics, geochemistry, palaeontology, oceanography, atmospheric chemistry, atmospheric physics, meteorology, glaciology, etc etc etc.
Hundreds of thousands of scientific papers, over decade after decade, from research in dozens of countries, since the 19th century. It's not some fringe thing from a handful of scientists.
The current scientific understanding of climate change is accepted by every professional association of research scientists on Earth - in every field of science. Over 200 academies.
These associations represent the global scientific community of around 9 million research scientists. For example..... . The Geological Society of London (the UK's expert association of professional geologists since 1807) says:
" ....the current speed of human-induced CO2 change and warming is nearly without precedent in the entire geological record, with the only known exception being the instantaneous, meteorite-induced event that caused the extinction of non-bird-like dinosaurs 66 million years ago"
The quote is from para 1 of this report........ https://www.geolsoc.org.uk/.../Geological%20Society%20of...
I reply:
Rocky Rex and all those orgnizations receive funding from the federal government, or from NGO's and universities all of which have a vested interest in this. Yes, it's a theory that goes back to Arrheneius, but that doesn't mean it's true. Geocentrism went back into the time of the ancient Greeks too and was finally overturned in the Middle Ages. The fact of the matter is there are plenty of papers and alternative explanations for the warming. The drop in planetary albedo, for instance, explains much of the warming. So does land use changes and the urban heat island effect. IF you are an honest researcher and are who you claim to be you know the argument is far more complex than the simplistic case made by the warmists. That you won't admit that suggests you are either a fraud or a partisan unwilling to look at alternative theories.
Some readers didn't like that reply:
Steve Snider
Tim Birdnow Easy to cast shade, but harder to post proof. Got any....proof?
Tim
Read the climategate e-mails if you want some proof. Look up the real genesis of this movement (it began as GLOBAL COOLING and the same people switched gears immediately when it was obvious the Earth was warming and not cooling). Proof is easy to come by if you bother to look.
Steve Snider
Tim Birdnow Not how it works. If you make a claim, it's only rational for you to back it up.
Incidentally, the 'climategate' nonsense was nearly 10 years ago, and yes, I did read it. Long, boring, and context matters.
There was NEVER a consensus on global cooling. I actually read the Time and Newsweek magazines at the time, and:
They were NOT from scientists who studied the environment;
They were NOT published in scientific journals;
They were quickly debunked by actual scientists.
You are correct that evidence is available, but actual science is a continual study.
I reply:
Steve Snider First it is you and yours who are making the extraordinary claims and demanding we change our entire society and way of life so it is up to YOU to prove your claim, not me mine. And I did provide you with the proof; we know that there was and remains a cabal of people in authority in these agencies who are pushing this and they abuse anyone who doesn't conform. Google Joanna Simpson; she was the first female climatologist at NASA. She said after she retired that she feared coming out as a skeptic because she knew she'd lose her job. Look at Judith Curry. For that matter look at what was done to Roy Spencer, a lukewarmer as opposed to a skeptic. They drove him out of NASA. Spencer then published a paper that disagreed with the alarmist view at Remote Sensing and your oh-so-principled champions went after the journal editor, forcing him to spike the paper and quit his job, solely because he published a peer reviewed paper that disagreed with some points of the dominant view.
I don't care if the Climategate e-mails were ten years ago or not; the same people are there, or their hand-picked successors.
And if you read the Climategate e-mails you know you are lying. I've read them and they are not out of context and they are in fact extremely damaging to your cause. In fact what happened to Spencer was something they were strategizing well before it happened.
You guys are tampering with peer review, bullying journal editors, threatening young scientists with dismissal and being blackballed if they don't stand with the dominant theory, abusing anyone who dares challenge your intellectual godhood. But science isn't about consensus but about challenging the orthodoxy, and frankly your theory has more holes in it than swiss cheese. But you never address the actual science of it because it's against you. Where is the tropical tropospheric hot spot? Why hasn't the Earth's albedo increased? Why are islands growing more than they are shrinking? Why did we have not one but TWO pauses in temperature anomalies?
Of course most young scientists now have been raised with this as an article of faith and don't even consider the possibility that it is wrong, and if they do they know they would be destroying their careers if they said anything.
You guys are rather like the Catholic Church resisting Galileo "and yet it still moves".
This has been a generation-long War of the Worlds scare and little more. It could only have happened in our modern era with instant communications and the control of the dissemination of information by people who want to fundamentally transform human civilization. A hundred years ago this theory would have been considered and rejected as nothing but computer models that do not comport with reality.
BTW your claim that Global Cooling only came from a Newsweek article is total bullshit. https://www.researchgate.net/.../347966094_The_1970s...
I was around at that time and it went way beyond just a magazine article. I've seen lists of papers claiming we were entering a cooling phase, although you can't find them online anymore because they are an embarrassment to the authors as well as to you alarmists. A great many of the names who signed on with global warming were stumping for global cooling first. Their argument was that aerosols were leading to an increased planetary albedo and thus were going to trigger an ice age. Perpetual alarmists.
Obama's science adviser John Holdren was one such. https://www.masterresource.org/.../john-holdren-on.../ And we have things like this https://web.archive.org/.../name/CHILLING_POSSIBILITIES where Science News claims there was a consensus over global cooling. NASA endorsed this theory. https://realclimatescience.com/.../screenhunter_127-feb...
You guys lie about this or are simply ignorant, willfully so. The reality is it was a big deal. The only reason they didn't call a consensus was because they didn't have an agency whose purpose was to promote it aka the IPCC. That is why the IPCC was formed in the first place; they didn't want a repeat of the Global Cooling scare.
It was a nice try though.
end
We'll see if this guy comes back but I doubt it; he would have to do actual research and find a solid way to rebut me, which he is going to find hard to do. I've long noticed that the Gang Green changes the subect whenever you nail them, launching a new line of attack - like all liberals. They use sleight-of-hand to distract people from the subject at hand. It works too by and large. But not with me.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:20 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 1454 words, total size 10 kb.
Public Support for Iran Conflict
Timothy Birdnow
More people support the attacks on Iran than do not.
Fifty two percent of the public thinks it was the right thing to do.
FTA:
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that 52% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of Trump’s decision to attack Iran, including 35% who Strongly Approve. Forty-two percent (42%) disapprove of the attack, including 30% who Strongly Disapprove.
More a plurality than a majority, but when you think about the peril associated with this it's a good sign. This is not Iraq.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
06:46 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 97 words, total size 1 kb.
March 18, 2026
Google Tampering with Voter Outreach
Timothy Birdnow
Big tech is at it again, suppressing voter outreach by the GOP.
FTA:
A new report has shown that Google’s email service Gmail has selectively prioritized inboxing campaign communications from Democrats over Republicans, with a significantly greater number of GOP communications being filtered into spam folders. This bias from Big Tech could clearly suppress the ability for Republicans to maintain regular contact with their supporters and give Democrats an obvious leg up on voter engagement.
[...]
The new study from Inbox. The GOP reviewed more than 12,000 emails from both Democratic and Republican political operations and found that more than half of the GOP emails were flagged as spam. The data shows that, over a 90-day period, 64 percent of Democrat communications were sent directly to inboxes while just 46 percent of Republican communications were inbox, a nearly 20 percent difference between the parties.
The last week of the study showed the gap increasing significantly, with almost 60 percent of GOP communications being filtered, while 70 percent of Democrat communications went directly to recipient inboxes.
Google is pure evil and needs to be broken up as a trust. Until our elected representatives grow a pair of danglies we will continue to see the thumb on the scale. It is strange that the Republicans aren't all over this sort of thing but they never are.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:57 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 243 words, total size 2 kb.
Monty Python and the Clash of Civilizations
Timothy Birdnow
And now for something completely different.
Eeets...
Actor John Cleese Warns Britain will Cease to Exist if Christian Values are Replaced by Islamic Ones
Yes, the former Monty Python star sees the forest for the trees - even if he IS riding an imaginary horse.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:46 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 54 words, total size 1 kb.
How the RINO Wing is Sabotaging the SAVE Act
Timothy Birdnow
How the GOPe plots to block the SAVE America Act.
These dirty tricks by the RINO wing include blocking a talking filibuster, which would only require a simple majority vote after the Democrats run out of steam as opposed to the supermajority that a zombie filibuster requires for cloture now, refusing to make a rule change to allow a talking filibuster (like we always had in America until recently) which is a lie as the current Senate rules still allow for a talker, refusing to whip adequately then saying it failed because of lack of votes, and dismissing Senators so there is no quorum.
Thune is determined to block the SAVE act for some baffling reason. And with that the Senate will remain on a knife edge, as will the House because we will allow illegals to vote and change the course of elections.
I have long argued that the RINO wing and the Democrats WANT these chambers to be neck-and-neck because it empowers incumbents. Nobody dares launch primary challenges because if they fail and lose just one seat it's an apocalypse. So the RINO wing stays in power in the GOP, as does the Tammany Hall types in the Democratic Party (like Chuck Schumer). So they resist changes like this because it will upset this delicate balance that they have to maintain to stay in power.
Well, Trump really screwed up when he backed John Thune and Trump needs to find a way to compel Thune to obey. We can't get rid of that jerk fast enough if you ask me; he's going to wreck the whole train we have going here. And with that America will fall because John Thune wanted to be a big shot.
Posted by: Timothy Birdnow at
10:36 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 299 words, total size 2 kb.
81kb generated in CPU 0.0345, elapsed 0.3858 seconds.
39 queries taking 0.3732 seconds, 223 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
39 queries taking 0.3732 seconds, 223 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.
